Metrics

Comprehensive Analytical Framework

Primary Performance Indicators

Combat Elimination +3.00 points
Operative Loss -1.00 points
Engagement Participation +2.00 points
Lane Resource Acquisition +0.01 per unit
Neutral Resource Acquisition +0.015 per unit
Economic Efficiency Index +0.05 per 10 GPM
Progression Coefficient +0.05 per 10 XPM

Performance Anomaly Coefficients

Initial Elimination Acquisition +4.00 points
Triple Sequential Eliminations +3.00 points
Quadruple Sequential Eliminations +5.00 points
Pentuple+ Sequential Eliminations +10.00 points
Victory Contribution Factor +5.00 points
Defeat Mitigation Factor +1.00 points

Statistical Equilibrium Parameters

Individual player evaluation metrics are calibrated to a maximum threshold of 50 points per match to maintain statistical validity across different player roles and game contexts.
Analytical model construction is constrained to maximum 2 operatives from any single professional organization to prevent statistical bias in the evaluation framework.

Role-Specific Statistical Classifications

Position 1: Primary Resource Allocation (Hard Carry)
Position 2: Secondary Resource Priority (Mid Lane)
Position 3: Tertiary Economic Priority (Offlane)
Position 4: Secondary Support Function
Position 5: Primary Support Operations

Computational Evaluation System

Every participant receives a comprehensive statistical evaluation based on their selected operative performance across each competitive iteration.
Competitive formats include daily statistical analyses, weekly performance aggregations, and complete tournament evaluation frameworks.
Superior strategists are featured on daily and weekly statistical leaderboards.

Advanced Statistical Indices

Beyond standard metrics: Our proprietary performance evaluation models

Efficiency Quotient (EQ)

Performance relative to resource allocation

Our proprietary Efficiency Quotient measures player performance impact relative to the resources allocated to them during a match:

EQ = [(K×3 + A×1.5 + GPM×0.005) ÷ (NW×0.0001 + Lvl×0.5)] × 100
Where: K = Kills, A = Assists, GPM = Gold Per Minute, NW = Net Worth, Lvl = Hero Level

Application by Position

Position 1:

Expected EQ: 120-150

Position 2:

Expected EQ: 130-160

Position 3:

Expected EQ: 140-170

Position 4:

Expected EQ: 160-190

Position 5:

Expected EQ: 180-220

Map Influence Index (MII)

Spatial control and pressure metrics

The Map Influence Index quantifies a player's territorial control and strategic pressure across the game environment:

35%

Vision Control

25%

Objective Pressure

40%

Positioning Metrics

MII Components

Vision Control: Ward placement effectiveness, observer uptime, and enemy ward detection rate
Objective Pressure: Tower damage, Roshan engagement, and neutral objective control
Positioning Metrics: Heat map analysis, movement efficiency, and tactical positioning evaluation

Strategic Versatility Coefficient (SVC)

Adaptability across game phases

The Strategic Versatility Coefficient measures a player's effectiveness across different game phases and strategic scenarios:

Game Phase Performance

Early Game:

Mid Game:

Late Game:

Strategic Context Adaptation

Winning Scenario: Performance when team has advantage
Recovery Scenario: Performance when team is at disadvantage
Even Scenario: Performance in closely contested matches

Synergy Impact Rating (SIR)

Team chemistry and interaction metrics

The Synergy Impact Rating evaluates how effectively a player's performance enhances their teammates' effectiveness:

Primary Synergy Metrics

Assist Quality Index: Contribution value to teammate eliminations
Resource Allocation Efficiency: Optimal distribution of team resources
Tactical Coordination: Effectiveness of coordinated team maneuvers

Comprehensive Player Evaluation Model

Our overall player rating synthesizes multiple performance dimensions into a unified analytical framework:

Combat Performance

35% of Overall Rating

Resource Efficiency

25% of Overall Rating

Map Control

20% of Overall Rating

Team Synergy